Practice what you preach.
We run our own method on our own portal — in public, with the raw exhibits and exactly where we go next. If we couldn’t do it for ourselves, we wouldn’t sell it to you.
The portal below belongs to Stratenet — a HubSpot partner agency operated by our founder. It is not a client. It is where the method was built, and it is the only portal we can show you at this stage — so we are showing all of it, including the parts that aren’t finished.
Same market. Same tracked keyword set. Same period.
Estimated visibility: 137.45 for us. 26.12 for the next one. And three of the four competitors went down over the same period, while we went up.
| Domain | Est. visibility | Δ period |
|---|---|---|
| stratenet.com | 137.45 | +79.94 |
| Competitor A | 26.12 | +5.47 |
| Competitor B | 11.65 | −1.21 |
| Competitor C | 6.88 | −2.92 |
| Competitor D | 6.37 | +2.19 |
Show the raw SEMrush screenshot (competitor names masked)
Where we stand today, against the same market.
We are not showing a growth percentage here: our tracked keyword set changed during the period, which would make the comparison misleading.
What you can compare is the gap — measured on the same day, on the same set, for everyone.
Position 1 across the category.
Every core query in our category, tracked from April to July. One moved from position 4 to position 1. The rest were already there, and stayed.
Position 1 across the category.
Every core query in our category, tracked from April to July. One moved from position 4 to position 1. The rest were already there, and stayed.
The same climb in Google Search Console.
Estimates are one thing; real impressions and clicks are another. Search Console is our first-party source of truth — here is the trend over the same window.
Average position in AI answers: from 19 to 14.7.
Across 112 tracked prompts. The acceleration in the second week of July is not a coincidence — it follows the optimisation work described in How We Work.
The prompts where we show up in ChatGPT.
Real buyer questions, from top of funnel to bottom. On 20 July, our pages are cited in the answer — most of them in first position.
The prompts where we show up in ChatGPT.
Real buyer questions, from top of funnel to bottom. On 20 July, our pages are cited in the answer — most of them in first position.
Not just present in AI answers — the brand cited most.
Measured inside SpotiFlow — the very product we sell — pointed at our own portal and four masked competitors, across every major AI engine.
Each cell is how often a brand is mentioned in AI answers for that theme. Darker is more. The marks the leader on each row — it lands on us in eight of ten.
Trusted on every engine, not just one.
97% of every mention of us across AI answers is favorable — and it holds from 92% on ChatGPT to 99% on Gemini. No weak flank.
First on the questions buyers actually ask.
On the real prompts that decide a deal, we are present on all four engines — in first position, with 100% favorable perception.
And here is the part most agencies would hide: our remaining growth potential on this keyword set is rated low.
That is exactly what winning looks like. We took what there was to take where we were looking. The next gain comes from new ground: brand entity and off-portal authority — the levers we build next.
We’ll walk you through Stratenet’s live dashboard — the real competitor names, the full timeline, and exactly where it stands today. Same screen we watch every week.
Built with far more than HubSpot.
HubSpot is where the work ships. Measurement and production run on a wider stack — cross-checked, never single-sourced.
We are publishing the target before we know the outcome.
Same queries, same engines, same number of runs. Come back on the date above and check.
We ran the 105-criteria engine on spotiflow.com as well.
Same engine, same criteria, same protocol we would run on you. Here is the score — including the categories where we are not there yet, and when we plan to fix them.
- On-page technical health 92
- Performance / Core Web Vitals 88
- Organic positioning 95
- Authority / Backlinks 74
- Search Console performance 86
- First-party AI traffic (GA4) 71
- AI-bot crawlability 100
- llms.txt 90
- Content retrievability 89
- Measured LLM visibility 68
- Brand entityWORK IN PROGRESS 52 Entity consistency — Knowledge Graph, Wikidata.PLAN Consolidate the brand entity across Wikidata, Knowledge Graph and official profiles.
- Semantic & funnel coverage 84
- Off-site authorityWORK IN PROGRESS 44
- RevOps (HubSpot) 80
- Aggregated score 79
Three beta seats. Reduced rate. One condition: we publish your numbers.
Baseline measured before we touch anything. Re-measured at day 90 with the same protocol. Published, whatever it says. You get the full method at a founding rate — we get the client case study we don’t have yet.
Cited in AI answers in 90 days. Or we keep working for free until you are.
Your target is a number, set in writing at your audit debrief, based on your own baseline. The remedy is work — never a refund.
Read the full guarantee ›We measured ourselves. Want to see your own numbers?
Same engine, same protocol, run on your portal. Your score, your five most critical issues, and how you compare in AI answers — free.
Get your free GEO auditQuestions about these numbers
Whose portal is this data from?
It belongs to a HubSpot partner agency operated by our founder — not a client. It is where the method was built and the only portal we can show at this stage, so we show all of it, including what isn’t finished.
Did you edit any of the numbers?
No values have been altered on any exhibit. Competitor names are masked as Competitor A–D, in descending order of value, with stable colours. Tool, scope, period and extraction date appear on every exhibit.
Why don’t you show a growth percentage?
Our tracked keyword set changed during the period, which would make a start-to-end percentage misleading. So we only show the gap measured on the same day, on the same set, for everyone — which is directly comparable.
What does “average position in AI answers” mean?
It is the average rank our pages hold inside AI answers across 112 tracked prompts — a lower number is better. It is not a visibility score. Ours improved by 4.2 places, from about 19 to 14.7.
Which tools do you use?
HubSpot Content Hub is where the work ships. Measurement and production run on a wider stack — SEMrush for positions, visibility and AI tracking; Claude for analysis and content agents; Google Analytics 4 and Search Console for first-party data; and our proprietary 105-criteria engine. Everything is cross-checked, never single-sourced.